
“The law, in its majestic equality, forbids
the rich as well as the poor to sleep under bridges ...” -- Anatole
France.
Of course, we all
know that the rich do not sleep under bridges, and so the law, which in this
case enforces the same rules of behavior for rich and poor, is not at all
majestic, or merciful, or just. Justice, Aristotle says, treats equal things
equally and unequal things unequally.
Let’s begin with an
obvious observation: a university talk by Ben Shapiro and Anita Hill are in no
sense equal. And we know from bitter experience that opposition to such talks
are radically (pun intended) unequal. President of UConn Susan Herbst would be
hard pressed to cite a case in which a political sermonette by a noted liberal
was cut short by audience thugs. But in the case of conservatives invited to
speak at colleges, address-interruptus, sometimes violent, always ill mannered,
is as common as applause. It would appear then that conservative speakers are
in no sense equal to liberal/progressive/socialist/communist speakers; their
messages are different, and reception to their messages is different.
Anita Hill was
permitted to speak a UConn without enduring the kind of interruptions that have
become common when conservative exercise their First Amendment rights at public
universities such as Berkley, where protesters set fires, broke windows,
taunted cops and speakers, and engaged in mob behavior reminiscent of Hitler’s Sturmabteilung. In California, a
progressive poverty catch-basin that has more homeless people on its streets
than Alabama, Antifa, aligned with other groups that would not protest a
college address given by, say, Anita Hill, was successful in closing down an addresses
given by Milo Yiannopoulos, a former senior editor of Breitbart News, a
“cultural libertarian,” a gay provocateur in full scale rebellion against the
baneful excesses of third wave feminism, radical Islam, political correctness, academic
intolerance and weepy students searching for safe places in edenic universities.