|
Pres. Trump signs "First Step Act" Image from Time Mag. |
Updated 3/24/24
By Michael Liebowitz
A Connecticut prisoner for some 25 years, Liebowitz was formerly housed at Osborn Correctional Institution in Somers, CT. He has been a free man since November 2022.
Since his release, he authored "View from a Cage: My Transformation from Convict to Crusader for Liberty" and currently hosts the podcast, "The Rational Egoist". Today, he and the love of his life, Melissa, need our help. They haven't the resources to absorb the associated loss of income and the expenses that come from Melissa's cancer treatment. Please consider making a ten-dollar donation to help Melissa, her son and Michael. Donate here. Along with Brett McCall, Liebowitz is also co-author of "Down the Rabbit Hole: How the Culture of Corrections Encourages Crime", available at Amazon. Dr. Stanton E. Samenow, PhD reviewed the work in a 3/12/21 article in Psychology Today magazine. In his review he writes, "I have found that Liebowitz and McCall are keen observers with a positive objective - to help others become more effective in helping people like themselves to change and become responsible human beings. This book is definitely worth a read." Liebowitz is also a regular guest with Todd Feinburg on WTIC AM 1080. Podcasts of Todd's segments with Liebowitz can be heard, here.
Widespread Implementation
of Evidence-Based Programs
Before delving into what I mean
by “evidence-based programs”, I think it will be helpful to first briefly
discuss the history of the idea that one of the purposes of prisons is to
rehabilitate offenders.
The
penitentiary system was created in the late 18th century and came
into prominence in the 19th. From
the beginning it was supposed that among the goals of incarceration was that of
reforming the character of criminals. Whether
through the “silent system” as at New York’s Auburn prison, or the “separate
system” at Pennsylvania’s Cherry Hill prison, it was thought that removing
offenders from society, making them labor, intensively, and teaching them
religion would get them to atone for their sins and alter their evil ways.
By
the late19th century it became clear that this model was failing,
and changes were soon enacted. Labor and
religion were still very much part of the prison experience, but new reforms,
such as indeterminate sentencing, were added to the mix. While never fully implemented in practice, the
idea of the indeterminate sentence was that there would be no specified period
of time to which criminals would be sentenced. Instead, they would be released when their
actions demonstrated that they were ready for society; this was thought to
provide offenders with the necessary incentive to reform themselves.
Parole,
probation, vocational education and rehabilitation programs developed in the
early 20th century, making up what came to be known as the
“rehabilitative ideal.” Then in 1954 the
American Prison Association became the American Correctional Association and
prisons became “correctional institutions.”
After
approximately 70 years as the dominant idea in criminal justice, the
rehabilitative ideal fell into disrepute. The 1960s and 70s were turbulent times
characterized by several high-profile assassinations, war, protests, and rising
crime rates. Many people lost faith in
society’s ability to reform offenders. A
perfect storm was in place for what was perhaps the most significant blow
against the rehabilitative ideal: Robert Martinson’s “nothing works” report.
A
plethora of studies have shown that certain types of programs, when implemented
properly, lead to significant reductions in recidivism.