Source unknown.
When you have someone that wants to argue gun control, have them contest these numbers.
Let me see someone try.
Let's talk about gun violence:
There are 30,000 gun related deaths per year by firearms, and this
number is not disputed. The U.S. population is 324,059,091 as of June
22, 2016. Do the math: 0.000000925% of the population dies from gun
related actions each year. Statistically small number! What is never
told, however, is a breakdown of those 30,000 deaths, to put them in
perspective as compared to other causes of death:
• 65% of those deaths are by suicide, which would never be prevented by gun laws.
• 15% are by law enforcement in the line of duty and justified.
• 17% are through criminal activity, gang and drug related or mentally ill persons – better known as gun violence.
• 3% are accidental discharge deaths.
So technically, "gun violence" is not 30,000 annually, but drops to
5,100. Still too many? Now lets look at how those deaths spanned across
the nation.
• 480 homicides (9.4%) were in Chicago
• 344 homicides (6.7%) were in Baltimore
• 333 homicides (6.5%) were in Detroit
• 119 homicides (2.3%) were in Washington D.C. (a 54% increase over prior years)
So basically, 25% of all gun crime happens in just 4 cities. All 4 of
those cities have strict gun laws, so it is not the lack of law that is
the root cause.
This basically leaves 3,825 for the entire rest of
the nation, or about 75 deaths per state. That is an average because
some States have much higher rates than others. For example, California
had 1,169 and Alabama had 1.
Now, who has the strictest gun laws by
far? California, of course, but understand, it is not guns causing this.
It is a crime rate spawned by the number of criminal persons residing
in those cities and states. So if all cities and states are not created
equal, then there must be something other than the tool causing the gun
deaths.