“The law, in its majestic equality, forbids
the rich as well as the poor to sleep under bridges ...” -- Anatole
France.
Of course, we all know that the rich do not sleep under bridges, and so the law, which in this case enforces the same rules of behavior for rich and poor, is not at all majestic, or merciful, or just. Justice, Aristotle says, treats equal things equally and unequal things unequally.
Let’s begin with an obvious observation: a university talk by Ben Shapiro and Anita Hill are in no sense equal. And we know from bitter experience that opposition to such talks are radically (pun intended) unequal. President of UConn Susan Herbst would be hard pressed to cite a case in which a political sermonette by a noted liberal was cut short by audience thugs. But in the case of conservatives invited to speak at colleges, address-interruptus, sometimes violent, always ill mannered, is as common as applause. It would appear then that conservative speakers are in no sense equal to liberal/progressive/socialist/communist speakers; their messages are different, and reception to their messages is different.
Of course, we all know that the rich do not sleep under bridges, and so the law, which in this case enforces the same rules of behavior for rich and poor, is not at all majestic, or merciful, or just. Justice, Aristotle says, treats equal things equally and unequal things unequally.
Let’s begin with an obvious observation: a university talk by Ben Shapiro and Anita Hill are in no sense equal. And we know from bitter experience that opposition to such talks are radically (pun intended) unequal. President of UConn Susan Herbst would be hard pressed to cite a case in which a political sermonette by a noted liberal was cut short by audience thugs. But in the case of conservatives invited to speak at colleges, address-interruptus, sometimes violent, always ill mannered, is as common as applause. It would appear then that conservative speakers are in no sense equal to liberal/progressive/socialist/communist speakers; their messages are different, and reception to their messages is different.
Anita Hill was permitted to speak a UConn without enduring the kind of interruptions that have become common when conservative exercise their First Amendment rights at public universities such as Berkley, where protesters set fires, broke windows, taunted cops and speakers, and engaged in mob behavior reminiscent of Hitler’s Sturmabteilung. In California, a progressive poverty catch-basin that has more homeless people on its streets than Alabama, Antifa, aligned with other groups that would not protest a college address given by, say, Anita Hill, was successful in closing down an addresses given by Milo Yiannopoulos, a former senior editor of Breitbart News, a “cultural libertarian,” a gay provocateur in full scale rebellion against the baneful excesses of third wave feminism, radical Islam, political correctness, academic intolerance and weepy students searching for safe places in edenic universities.
Some weeks ago,
audience thugs at UConn successfully shut down an address given by Lucian Wintrich , the White House correspondent for the Gateway Pundit, provocatively titled “It’s OK To Be
White.” Arrested by UConn police, perhaps in order to protect him from the
lynch mob in the audience determined to shut him down, charges against Wintrich
were quickly dropped. A prosecutor soon brought charges against one of his
tormentors, student adviser at Quinebaug Valley Community College
Catherine Gregory, who had created a ruckus by stealing notes from the
speaker’s speech. Her charges were later
reduced.
That incident
produced an administrative policy at the university that, in its majestic
equality, forbids both conservative and progressives to attend college
addresses at UConn, unless the attendees are UConn students.
Obvious observation
number two: Ben Shapiro is not Yiannapolis – not that there’s anything wrong
with being Milo. Neither is he Wintrich or Anita Hill, best remembered in
connection with her opposition to the nomination to the Supreme Court of Justice
Clarence Thomas, an African American Associate Justice married to a white woman
who presumably is non-racist. Nor is Shapiro an alt-righter, as he has been
labeled in recent news reports issuing from Connecticut’s inattentive media. In
fact, Shapiro is an adamant non-alt-righter.
Author Don Pesci |
In remarks preceding
his address, “White Privilege Microaggressions and Other Leftist Myths,”
Shapiro lamented that . . .
To read the rest of Don's commentary, visit his web site.
You can read more about this issue, here: UConn offers counseling, restricts access to Shapiro event
No comments:
Post a Comment
The South Central Bulldog reserves the right to reject any comment for any reason, without explanation.